Head-to-Head Analysis

Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk vs Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk

Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese

Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
84.7 kcal
Energy
214.3 kcal
11.9g
Sugars
0g
2.3g
Fat
7.1g
4g
Protein
32.1g
0.2g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk and Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk is the clear winner. With 130 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk contains significantly more sugar (11.9g) compared to the milder Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk or Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk has 84.7 calories, while Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese has 214.29 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk vegan?

No, Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reduced fat strawberry mmmmilk and Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese?

There is a difference of 130 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.