Head-to-Head Analysis

Reese’s White Trees vs Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Reese’s White Trees

Reese’s White Trees

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip

Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
529 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
44.1g
Sugars
25g
32.4g
Fat
29.2g
11.8g
Protein
4.2g
1g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reese’s White Trees and Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Reese’s White Trees is the more energy-dense option here, packing 29 more calories per 100g than Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Reese’s White Trees contains significantly more sugar (44.1g) compared to the milder Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip (25g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Reese’s White Trees offers a protein boost with 11.8g per 100g, outperforming Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reese’s White Trees or Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip?

It depends on your goals. Reese’s White Trees has 529 calories, while Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Reese’s White Trees vegan?

No, Reese’s White Trees is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reese’s White Trees and Soft Baked Mini Cookies Chocolate Chip?

There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.