Head-to-Head Analysis

Rice Pilaf vs Chink Light Tuna In Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Rice Pilaf

Rice Pilaf

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chink Light Tuna In Water

Chink Light Tuna In Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
625 kcal
Energy
120 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
1.1g
15.9g
Protein
26.1g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rice Pilaf and Chink Light Tuna In Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Rice Pilaf is the more energy-dense option here, packing 505 more calories per 100g than Chink Light Tuna In Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rice Pilaf or Chink Light Tuna In Water?

It depends on your goals. Rice Pilaf has 625 calories, while Chink Light Tuna In Water has 120 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rice Pilaf vegan?

No, Rice Pilaf is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rice Pilaf and Chink Light Tuna In Water?

There is a difference of 505 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.