Head-to-Head Analysis

Roasted No- Shell Pistachios vs Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Roasted No- Shell Pistachios

Roasted No- Shell Pistachios

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes

Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
24.4 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
4.9g
43.3g
Fat
0g
20g
Protein
0.8g
1.8g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Roasted No- Shell Pistachios and Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Roasted No- Shell Pistachios is the more energy-dense option here, packing 543 more calories per 100g than Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Roasted No- Shell Pistachios contains significantly more sugar (6.67g) compared to the milder Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes (4.88g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Roasted No- Shell Pistachios offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Roasted No- Shell Pistachios or Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes?

It depends on your goals. Roasted No- Shell Pistachios has 567 calories, while Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes has 24.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Roasted No- Shell Pistachios vegan?

No, Roasted No- Shell Pistachios is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Roasted No- Shell Pistachios and Mexican Style Stewed Tomatoes?

There is a difference of 543 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.