Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar vs Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar
Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar and Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 6 more calories per 100g than Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar takes the lead with only 17.391304347826g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry contains 22.2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar offers a protein boost with 34.782608695652g per 100g, outperforming Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar or Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry?
It depends on your goals. Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar has 413.04347826087 calories, while Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry has 407 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar vegan?
No, Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Robert Irvine’s Fit Crunch Bar and Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry?
There is a difference of 6 calories per 100g between the two products.
