Head-to-Head Analysis

Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate vs Spring & Mulberry Coffee

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate

Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Spring & Mulberry Coffee

Spring & Mulberry Coffee

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
600 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
40g
Sugars
0g
44g
Fat
0g
8g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate and Spring & Mulberry Coffee side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 600 more calories per 100g than Spring & Mulberry Coffee. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Spring & Mulberry Coffee (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Spring & Mulberry Coffee is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming Spring & Mulberry Coffee in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate or Spring & Mulberry Coffee?

It depends on your goals. Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate has 600 calories, while Spring & Mulberry Coffee has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate vegan?

No, Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rocher fine hazelnut chocolate and Spring & Mulberry Coffee?

There is a difference of 600 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.