Roll vs No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Roll
No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Roll and No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Roll is the clear winner. With 217 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Roll contains significantly more sugar (5.26315789473684g) compared to the milder No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Roll offers a protein boost with 9.21052631578947g per 100g, outperforming No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Roll or No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers?
It depends on your goals. Roll has 263.157894736842 calories, while No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers has 480 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Roll vegan?
No, Roll is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Roll and No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers?
There is a difference of 217 calories per 100g between the two products.
