Head-to-Head Analysis

Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil vs CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil

Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
97.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
23.8g
Fat
0.9g
20g
Protein
21.2g
0.7g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil and CHUNK LIGHT TUNA side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil is the more energy-dense option here, packing 203 more calories per 100g than CHUNK LIGHT TUNA. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil or CHUNK LIGHT TUNA?

It depends on your goals. Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil has 300 calories, while CHUNK LIGHT TUNA has 97.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil vegan?

No, Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil and CHUNK LIGHT TUNA?

There is a difference of 203 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.