Head-to-Head Analysis

Royale, boneless cooked ham vs Solid light tuna in olive oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Royale, boneless cooked ham

Royale, boneless cooked ham

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Solid light tuna in olive oil

Solid light tuna in olive oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
212 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
8.9g
Fat
13.5g
16.1g
Protein
23.1g
2.3g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Royale, boneless cooked ham and Solid light tuna in olive oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Royale, boneless cooked ham is the clear winner. With 69 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Royale, boneless cooked ham or Solid light tuna in olive oil?

It depends on your goals. Royale, boneless cooked ham has 143 calories, while Solid light tuna in olive oil has 212 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Royale, boneless cooked ham vegan?

No, Royale, boneless cooked ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Royale, boneless cooked ham and Solid light tuna in olive oil?

There is a difference of 69 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.