Head-to-Head Analysis

Ruby Boots vs Saba banana chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ruby Boots

Ruby Boots

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Saba banana chips

Saba banana chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
33.3 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
7.6g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
35.7g
0.7g
Protein
3.6g
0.1g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ruby Boots and Saba banana chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ruby Boots is the clear winner. With 538 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ruby Boots contains significantly more sugar (7.56g) compared to the milder Saba banana chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Saba banana chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ruby Boots or Saba banana chips?

It depends on your goals. Ruby Boots has 33.3 calories, while Saba banana chips has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ruby Boots vegan?

No, Ruby Boots is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ruby Boots and Saba banana chips?

There is a difference of 538 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.