Head-to-Head Analysis

Rustic Chicken vs Sipahh straws

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Rustic Chicken

Rustic Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sipahh straws

Sipahh straws

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
95.7 kcal
Energy
386 kcal
0.8g
Sugars
52g
3g
Fat
0.6g
8.3g
Protein
1.2g
0.6g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rustic Chicken and Sipahh straws side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Rustic Chicken is the clear winner. With 290 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Rustic Chicken takes the lead with only 0.756g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sipahh straws contains 52g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Rustic Chicken offers a protein boost with 8.31g per 100g, outperforming Sipahh straws in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rustic Chicken or Sipahh straws?

Rustic Chicken appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Rustic Chicken vegan?

No, Rustic Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rustic Chicken and Sipahh straws?

There is a difference of 290 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.