Head-to-Head Analysis

Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna vs Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna

Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines

Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
129.4 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
30.6g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna and Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 129 more calories per 100g than Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna offers a protein boost with 30.588235294118g per 100g, outperforming Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna or Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines?

It depends on your goals. Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna has 129.41176470588 calories, while Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna vegan?

No, Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Safe catch Ahi Wild Yellowfin Tuna and Beach cliff in soybean oil whot green chilies sardines?

There is a difference of 129 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.