Head-to-Head Analysis

Salted Caramel Chip vs Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Salted Caramel Chip

Salted Caramel Chip

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
378 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
0g
24.4g
Fat
28.6g
26.7g
Protein
7.1g
1.1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salted Caramel Chip and Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Salted Caramel Chip is the clear winner. With 158 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Salted Caramel Chip contains significantly more sugar (2.22g) compared to the milder Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Salted Caramel Chip offers a protein boost with 26.7g per 100g, outperforming Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salted Caramel Chip or Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Salted Caramel Chip has 378 calories, while Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salted Caramel Chip vegan?

No, Salted Caramel Chip is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salted Caramel Chip and Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 158 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.