Head-to-Head Analysis

Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate vs Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate

Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips

Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
42.9g
Sugars
0g
35.7g
Fat
28.6g
7.1g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate and Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 35 more calories per 100g than Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (42.9g) compared to the milder Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate or Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate has 571 calories, while Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate vegan?

No, Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate and Mexican restaurant style tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.