Head-to-Head Analysis

Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash vs La costena pickled jalapeno nacho

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash

Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of La costena pickled jalapeno nacho

La costena pickled jalapeno nacho

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
13 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
0.2g
5.4g
Protein
0.3g
0.9g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash and La costena pickled jalapeno nacho side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash is the more energy-dense option here, packing 237 more calories per 100g than La costena pickled jalapeno nacho. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash offers a protein boost with 5.3571428571429g per 100g, outperforming La costena pickled jalapeno nacho in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash or La costena pickled jalapeno nacho?

It depends on your goals. Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash has 250 calories, while La costena pickled jalapeno nacho has 13 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash vegan?

No, Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sami's Bakery Millet and Flax Sundried Tomato Lavash and La costena pickled jalapeno nacho?

There is a difference of 237 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.