Head-to-Head Analysis

SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE vs Cascade style potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE

SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cascade style potato chips

Cascade style potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
28.6g
7.1g
Protein
7.1g
1.1g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE and Cascade style potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE is the clear winner. With 286 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cascade style potato chips contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE or Cascade style potato chips?

SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE vegan?

No, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BOULE and Cascade style potato chips?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.