Head-to-Head Analysis

Sarsparilla vs cocoyo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sarsparilla

Sarsparilla

Not Vegan
VS
Package of cocoyo

cocoyo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
381 kcal
Energy
79.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.8g
33.3g
Fat
5.3g
23.8g
Protein
2.7g
1.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sarsparilla and cocoyo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sarsparilla is the more energy-dense option here, packing 301 more calories per 100g than cocoyo. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sarsparilla takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas cocoyo contains 1.77g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sarsparilla offers a protein boost with 23.81g per 100g, outperforming cocoyo in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sarsparilla or cocoyo?

It depends on your goals. Sarsparilla has 381 calories, while cocoyo has 79.6 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sarsparilla vegan?

No, Sarsparilla is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sarsparilla and cocoyo?

There is a difference of 301 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.