Head-to-Head Analysis

Sarsparilla vs Whole Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sarsparilla

Sarsparilla

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Whole Milk

Whole Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
381 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
33.3g
Fat
0g
23.8g
Protein
0g
1.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sarsparilla and Whole Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sarsparilla is the more energy-dense option here, packing 381 more calories per 100g than Whole Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Sarsparilla offers a protein boost with 23.81g per 100g, outperforming Whole Milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sarsparilla or Whole Milk?

It depends on your goals. Sarsparilla has 381 calories, while Whole Milk has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sarsparilla vegan?

No, Sarsparilla is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sarsparilla and Whole Milk?

There is a difference of 381 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.