Head-to-Head Analysis

Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin vs Lentil Soup

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin

Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lentil Soup

Lentil Soup

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
225 kcal
Energy
57.1 kcal
5g
Sugars
0.8g
3.8g
Fat
1.2g
7.5g
Protein
2.9g
0.9g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin and Lentil Soup side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin is the more energy-dense option here, packing 168 more calories per 100g than Lentil Soup. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Lentil Soup (0.81632653061224g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lentil Soup is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin offers a protein boost with 7.5g per 100g, outperforming Lentil Soup in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin or Lentil Soup?

It depends on your goals. Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin has 225 calories, while Lentil Soup has 57.142857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin vegan?

No, Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Schmidt old tyme bread split-top wheat twin and Lentil Soup?

There is a difference of 168 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.