Head-to-Head Analysis

Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese vs Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese

Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk

Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
50 kcal
0g
Sugars
5g
28.6g
Fat
2.1g
23.8g
Protein
3.3g
1.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese and Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese is the more energy-dense option here, packing 283 more calories per 100g than Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese offers a protein boost with 23.81g per 100g, outperforming Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese or Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk?

It depends on your goals. Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese has 333 calories, while Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese vegan?

No, Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese and Kroger, lactose free 2% reduced fat milk?

There is a difference of 283 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.