Head-to-Head Analysis

Shashuska vs Tuna in water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Shashuska

Shashuska

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tuna in water

Tuna in water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
122 kcal
Energy
106.2 kcal
4.4g
Sugars
0g
3.9g
Fat
0.4g
13.3g
Protein
24.8g
0.7g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Shashuska and Tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Shashuska is the more energy-dense option here, packing 16 more calories per 100g than Tuna in water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Shashuska contains significantly more sugar (4.44g) compared to the milder Tuna in water (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tuna in water is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Shashuska or Tuna in water?

It depends on your goals. Shashuska has 122 calories, while Tuna in water has 106.19469026549 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Shashuska vegan?

No, Shashuska is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Shashuska and Tuna in water?

There is a difference of 16 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.