Head-to-Head Analysis

Sidekicks vs Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sidekicks

Sidekicks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count

Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
115.4 kcal
Energy
486 kcal
3.8g
Sugars
0g
2.3g
Fat
21.6g
5.4g
Protein
5.4g
0.7g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sidekicks and Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sidekicks is the clear winner. With 371 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sidekicks contains significantly more sugar (3.8461538461538g) compared to the milder Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sidekicks or Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count?

It depends on your goals. Sidekicks has 115.38461538462 calories, while Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count has 486 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sidekicks vegan?

No, Sidekicks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sidekicks and Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count?

There is a difference of 371 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.