Silk sweet oat creamer vs La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Silk sweet oat creamer
La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Silk sweet oat creamer and La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Silk sweet oat creamer is the clear winner. With 203 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Silk sweet oat creamer contains significantly more sugar (28.2g) compared to the milder La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia (3.45g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Silk sweet oat creamer or La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia?
It depends on your goals. Silk sweet oat creamer has 176 calories, while La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia has 379 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Silk sweet oat creamer vegan?
No, Silk sweet oat creamer is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Silk sweet oat creamer and La Moderna, Coil Fideo, Macaroni Product Pasta Alimenticia?
There is a difference of 203 calories per 100g between the two products.
