Head-to-Head Analysis

Simms Peppered Beef Jerky vs Sweet potato corn tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simms Peppered Beef Jerky

Simms Peppered Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet potato corn tortilla chips

Sweet potato corn tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285.7 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
3.6g
3.6g
Fat
25g
46.4g
Protein
7.1g
4.4g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simms Peppered Beef Jerky and Sweet potato corn tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Simms Peppered Beef Jerky is the clear winner. With 214 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simms Peppered Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (17.857142857143g) compared to the milder Sweet potato corn tortilla chips (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet potato corn tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Simms Peppered Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 46.428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Sweet potato corn tortilla chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simms Peppered Beef Jerky or Sweet potato corn tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Simms Peppered Beef Jerky has 285.71428571429 calories, while Sweet potato corn tortilla chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simms Peppered Beef Jerky vegan?

No, Simms Peppered Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simms Peppered Beef Jerky and Sweet potato corn tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 214 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.