Head-to-Head Analysis

Simple Dark Chocolate vs Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simple Dark Chocolate

Simple Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks

Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
633 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
26.7g
Sugars
6.7g
46.7g
Fat
10g
10g
Protein
6.7g
0.1g
Salt
3.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simple Dark Chocolate and Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Simple Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simple Dark Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (26.7g) compared to the milder Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks (6.67g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Simple Dark Chocolate offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simple Dark Chocolate or Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks?

It depends on your goals. Simple Dark Chocolate has 633 calories, while Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simple Dark Chocolate vegan?

No, Simple Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simple Dark Chocolate and Gluten Free Sea Salt Pretzel Sticks?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.