Head-to-Head Analysis

Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula vs Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula

Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron

Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
66.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
5.3g
Fat
0g
2.5g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula and Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula offers a protein boost with 2.5g per 100g, outperforming Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula or Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron?

It depends on your goals. Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula has 100 calories, while Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron has 66.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula vegan?

No, Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simply Plant-Based Infant Formula and Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.