Head-to-Head Analysis

Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken vs Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken

Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions

Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
68.7 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
3.8g
Sugars
0g
1.7g
Fat
35.7g
4.6g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken and Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken is the clear winner. With 502 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken contains significantly more sugar (3.8167938931298g) compared to the milder Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken offers a protein boost with 4.5801526717557g per 100g, outperforming Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken or Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions?

It depends on your goals. Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken has 68.702290076336 calories, while Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken vegan?

No, Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simply Steamers Sesame Chicken and Garlic Pepper Crispy Onions?

There is a difference of 502 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.