Head-to-Head Analysis

Sirloin tender steak vs BBQ Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sirloin tender steak

Sirloin tender steak

Not Vegan
VS
Package of BBQ Flavored

BBQ Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
134 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
4.5g
Fat
32.1g
23.2g
Protein
3.6g
0.2g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sirloin tender steak and BBQ Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sirloin tender steak is the clear winner. With 402 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sirloin tender steak takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas BBQ Flavored contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sirloin tender steak offers a protein boost with 23.2g per 100g, outperforming BBQ Flavored in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sirloin tender steak or BBQ Flavored?

Sirloin tender steak appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sirloin tender steak vegan?

No, Sirloin tender steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sirloin tender steak and BBQ Flavored?

There is a difference of 402 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.