Skipjack wild tuna in water vs Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Skipjack wild tuna in water
Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Skipjack wild tuna in water and Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Skipjack wild tuna in water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 0 more calories per 100g than Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Looking to build muscle? Skipjack wild tuna in water offers a protein boost with 23.9g per 100g, outperforming Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Skipjack wild tuna in water or Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon?
It depends on your goals. Skipjack wild tuna in water has 106 calories, while Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Skipjack wild tuna in water vegan?
No, Skipjack wild tuna in water is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Skipjack wild tuna in water and Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon?
There is a difference of 0 calories per 100g between the two products.
