Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced colby jack natural cheese vs Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sliced colby jack natural cheese

Sliced colby jack natural cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized

Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
368.4 kcal
Energy
116.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.3g
31.6g
Fat
10g
26.3g
Protein
3.3g
1.7g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced colby jack natural cheese and Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sliced colby jack natural cheese is the more energy-dense option here, packing 252 more calories per 100g than Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sliced colby jack natural cheese takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized contains 3.3333g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sliced colby jack natural cheese offers a protein boost with 26.315789473684g per 100g, outperforming Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced colby jack natural cheese or Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized?

It depends on your goals. Sliced colby jack natural cheese has 368.42105263158 calories, while Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized has 116.6667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced colby jack natural cheese vegan?

No, Sliced colby jack natural cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced colby jack natural cheese and Half & Half Ultra-Pasteurized?

There is a difference of 252 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.