Head-to-Head Analysis

Slik vs Wrigley's Doublemint slim pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Slik

Slik

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wrigley's Doublemint slim pack

Wrigley's Doublemint slim pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
10 kcal
0g
Sugars
2g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Slik and Wrigley's Doublemint slim pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Slik is the clear winner. With 10 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Slik takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wrigley's Doublemint slim pack contains 2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Slik or Wrigley's Doublemint slim pack?

Slik appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Slik vegan?

No, Slik is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Slik and Wrigley's Doublemint slim pack?

There is a difference of 10 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.