Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil vs Biscuit ham slices
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil
Biscuit ham slices
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil and Biscuit ham slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil is the more energy-dense option here, packing 121 more calories per 100g than Biscuit ham slices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil contains significantly more sugar (4g) compared to the milder Biscuit ham slices (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Biscuit ham slices is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil offers a protein boost with 22.7g per 100g, outperforming Biscuit ham slices in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil or Biscuit ham slices?
It depends on your goals. Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil has 227 calories, while Biscuit ham slices has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil vegan?
No, Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil and Biscuit ham slices?
There is a difference of 121 calories per 100g between the two products.
