Head-to-Head Analysis

Small slice oatnut vs Kalamata Olive

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Small slice oatnut

Small slice oatnut

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kalamata Olive

Kalamata Olive

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
214 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
3.6g
5.4g
Fat
12.5g
10.7g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Small slice oatnut and Kalamata Olive side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Small slice oatnut is the more energy-dense option here, packing 72 more calories per 100g than Kalamata Olive. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Small slice oatnut contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder Kalamata Olive (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kalamata Olive is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Small slice oatnut offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Kalamata Olive in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Small slice oatnut or Kalamata Olive?

It depends on your goals. Small slice oatnut has 286 calories, while Kalamata Olive has 214 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Small slice oatnut vegan?

No, Small slice oatnut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Small slice oatnut and Kalamata Olive?

There is a difference of 72 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.