Head-to-Head Analysis

Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil vs Gnocchi

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil

Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Gnocchi

Gnocchi

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
155 kcal
2.3g
Sugars
0g
2.7g
Fat
0.5g
7.8g
Protein
3.6g
1.1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil and Gnocchi side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil is the clear winner. With 30 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil contains significantly more sugar (2.34g) compared to the milder Gnocchi (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Gnocchi is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil offers a protein boost with 7.81g per 100g, outperforming Gnocchi in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil or Gnocchi?

It depends on your goals. Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil has 125 calories, while Gnocchi has 155 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil vegan?

No, Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Smart Bowls Barley & Beans with Tuna Tomato Basil and Gnocchi?

There is a difference of 30 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.