Head-to-Head Analysis

Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger vs Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger

Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
61.9 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
9.7g
Sugars
2.9g
0g
Fat
37.1g
2.7g
Protein
14.3g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger and Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger is the clear winner. With 367 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger contains significantly more sugar (9.73g) compared to the milder Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate (2.86g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger or Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger has 61.9 calories, while Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger vegan?

No, Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Smoothables Diced Red Blend by Kroger and Nut & Seed Bar, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 367 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.