Head-to-Head Analysis

Snack advance bar vs Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Snack advance bar

Snack advance bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
386.4 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
22.7g
Sugars
0g
20.5g
Fat
28.6g
20.5g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Snack advance bar and Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Snack advance bar is the clear winner. With 150 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Snack advance bar contains significantly more sugar (22.727272727273g) compared to the milder Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Snack advance bar offers a protein boost with 20.454545454545g per 100g, outperforming Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Snack advance bar or Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Snack advance bar has 386.36363636364 calories, while Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Snack advance bar vegan?

No, Snack advance bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Snack advance bar and Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 150 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.