Head-to-Head Analysis

Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks vs CHICKEN MEATBALLS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks

Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CHICKEN MEATBALLS

CHICKEN MEATBALLS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
176 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
0g
5.4g
Fat
10.6g
25g
Protein
18.8g
3.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks and CHICKEN MEATBALLS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 38 more calories per 100g than CHICKEN MEATBALLS. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder CHICKEN MEATBALLS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, CHICKEN MEATBALLS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming CHICKEN MEATBALLS in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks or CHICKEN MEATBALLS?

It depends on your goals. Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks has 214 calories, while CHICKEN MEATBALLS has 176 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks vegan?

No, Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Snack Mates Chicken & Apple Mini Sticks and CHICKEN MEATBALLS?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.