Head-to-Head Analysis

Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies vs Original minis fruit chews candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies

Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original minis fruit chews candy

Original minis fruit chews candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
440 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
32g
Sugars
67.9g
16g
Fat
3.6g
4g
Protein
0g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies and Original minis fruit chews candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 47 more calories per 100g than Original minis fruit chews candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies takes the lead with only 32g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original minis fruit chews candy contains 67.86g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies offers a protein boost with 4g per 100g, outperforming Original minis fruit chews candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies or Original minis fruit chews candy?

It depends on your goals. Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies has 440 calories, while Original minis fruit chews candy has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies vegan?

No, Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Snicker Doodle Soft Baked Cookies and Original minis fruit chews candy?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.