Head-to-Head Analysis

Sno-Berry vs Kirkland

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sno-Berry

Sno-Berry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kirkland

Kirkland

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
39.4 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
10.4g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
113g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sno-Berry and Kirkland side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sno-Berry is the more energy-dense option here, packing 39 more calories per 100g than Kirkland. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sno-Berry contains significantly more sugar (10.4g) compared to the milder Kirkland (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kirkland is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sno-Berry or Kirkland?

It depends on your goals. Sno-Berry has 39.4 calories, while Kirkland has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sno-Berry vegan?

No, Sno-Berry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sno-Berry and Kirkland?

There is a difference of 39 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.