Soft Australian Licorice vs wheat thins crackers, original
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Soft Australian Licorice
wheat thins crackers, original
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Soft Australian Licorice and wheat thins crackers, original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Soft Australian Licorice is the clear winner. With 119 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Soft Australian Licorice contains significantly more sugar (36.666666666667g) compared to the milder wheat thins crackers, original (16.13g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, wheat thins crackers, original is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Soft Australian Licorice or wheat thins crackers, original?
It depends on your goals. Soft Australian Licorice has 333.33333333333 calories, while wheat thins crackers, original has 452 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Soft Australian Licorice vegan?
No, Soft Australian Licorice is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Soft Australian Licorice and wheat thins crackers, original?
There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.
