Head-to-Head Analysis

Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored vs Highland oatcakes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored

Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Highland oatcakes

Highland oatcakes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
351 kcal
Energy
465 kcal
43.2g
Sugars
2.6g
2.7g
Fat
19.3g
2.7g
Protein
10.9g
0.1g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored and Highland oatcakes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored is the clear winner. With 114 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored contains significantly more sugar (43.24g) compared to the milder Highland oatcakes (2.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Highland oatcakes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored or Highland oatcakes?

It depends on your goals. Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored has 351 calories, while Highland oatcakes has 465 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored vegan?

No, Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored and Highland oatcakes?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.