Head-to-Head Analysis

Solid White Albacore Tuna vs Scottish Salmon Steak

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Solid White Albacore Tuna

Solid White Albacore Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Scottish Salmon Steak

Scottish Salmon Steak

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97.3 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
0g
23g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Solid White Albacore Tuna and Scottish Salmon Steak side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Solid White Albacore Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 97 more calories per 100g than Scottish Salmon Steak. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Solid White Albacore Tuna offers a protein boost with 23g per 100g, outperforming Scottish Salmon Steak in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Solid White Albacore Tuna or Scottish Salmon Steak?

It depends on your goals. Solid White Albacore Tuna has 97.3 calories, while Scottish Salmon Steak has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Solid White Albacore Tuna vegan?

No, Solid White Albacore Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Solid White Albacore Tuna and Scottish Salmon Steak?

There is a difference of 97 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.