Head-to-Head Analysis

Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp vs Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp

Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime

Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
3.6g
0.3g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp and Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp is the clear winner. With 131 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp contains significantly more sugar (13.3g) compared to the milder Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp or Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime?

It depends on your goals. Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp has 333 calories, while Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime has 464.28571428571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp vegan?

No, Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Soothe’n’chew teething sticks imp and Grain Free Tortilla Chips Squeeze of Lime?

There is a difference of 131 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.