Starbucks Mountain blend vs Slightly Coated Dark Chocolate Almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Starbucks Mountain blend
Slightly Coated Dark Chocolate Almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Starbucks Mountain blend and Slightly Coated Dark Chocolate Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Starbucks Mountain blend is the clear winner. With 536 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Starbucks Mountain blend takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slightly Coated Dark Chocolate Almonds contains 14.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Starbucks Mountain blend or Slightly Coated Dark Chocolate Almonds?
Starbucks Mountain blend appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Starbucks Mountain blend vegan?
No, Starbucks Mountain blend is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Starbucks Mountain blend and Slightly Coated Dark Chocolate Almonds?
There is a difference of 536 calories per 100g between the two products.
