Head-to-Head Analysis

Steak-ums vs Uncured Angus Beef Franks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Steak-ums

Steak-ums

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Uncured Angus Beef Franks

Uncured Angus Beef Franks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
406 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
34.4g
Fat
26g
21.9g
Protein
12g
0.2g
Salt
2.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Steak-ums and Uncured Angus Beef Franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Steak-ums is the more energy-dense option here, packing 106 more calories per 100g than Uncured Angus Beef Franks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Steak-ums offers a protein boost with 21.9g per 100g, outperforming Uncured Angus Beef Franks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Steak-ums or Uncured Angus Beef Franks?

It depends on your goals. Steak-ums has 406 calories, while Uncured Angus Beef Franks has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Steak-ums vegan?

No, Steak-ums is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Steak-ums and Uncured Angus Beef Franks?

There is a difference of 106 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.