Head-to-Head Analysis

Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style vs Veri Veri Teriyaki

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style

Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Veri Veri Teriyaki

Veri Veri Teriyaki

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
129 kcal
Energy
211 kcal
73.5g
Sugars
36.8g
0g
Fat
5.3g
0g
Protein
0g
2.4g
Salt
7.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style and Veri Veri Teriyaki side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style is the clear winner. With 82 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style contains significantly more sugar (73.5g) compared to the milder Veri Veri Teriyaki (36.8g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Veri Veri Teriyaki is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style or Veri Veri Teriyaki?

It depends on your goals. Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style has 129 calories, while Veri Veri Teriyaki has 211 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style vegan?

No, Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sticky fingers, smokehouse barbecue sauce, memphis style and Veri Veri Teriyaki?

There is a difference of 82 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.