Head-to-Head Analysis

Strawberry Fields vs Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Strawberry Fields

Strawberry Fields

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl

Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
358 kcal
Energy
219.5 kcal
20.5g
Sugars
7.3g
0.7g
Fat
5.7g
9.4g
Protein
6.9g
0.8g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Strawberry Fields and Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Strawberry Fields is the more energy-dense option here, packing 138 more calories per 100g than Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Strawberry Fields contains significantly more sugar (20.5g) compared to the milder Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl (7.3170731707317g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Strawberry Fields offers a protein boost with 9.4g per 100g, outperforming Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Strawberry Fields or Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl?

It depends on your goals. Strawberry Fields has 358 calories, while Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl has 219.51219512195 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Strawberry Fields vegan?

No, Strawberry Fields is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Strawberry Fields and Thai-Style Peanut Sesame Noodle Bowl?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.