Head-to-Head Analysis

Strawberry Mule vs Almond Nut-Thins Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Strawberry Mule

Strawberry Mule

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Almond Nut-Thins Original

Almond Nut-Thins Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
71.4g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
8.3g
0g
Protein
10g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Strawberry Mule and Almond Nut-Thins Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Strawberry Mule is the clear winner. With 76 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Strawberry Mule contains significantly more sugar (71.4g) compared to the milder Almond Nut-Thins Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Almond Nut-Thins Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Strawberry Mule or Almond Nut-Thins Original?

It depends on your goals. Strawberry Mule has 357 calories, while Almond Nut-Thins Original has 433.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Strawberry Mule vegan?

No, Strawberry Mule is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Strawberry Mule and Almond Nut-Thins Original?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.