Head-to-Head Analysis

Sugar Cookie vs Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sugar Cookie

Sugar Cookie

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt

Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
480 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
36g
Sugars
0g
20g
Fat
21.4g
4g
Protein
3.6g
0.5g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sugar Cookie and Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sugar Cookie is the more energy-dense option here, packing 16 more calories per 100g than Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sugar Cookie contains significantly more sugar (36g) compared to the milder Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sugar Cookie or Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt?

It depends on your goals. Sugar Cookie has 480 calories, while Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt has 464.28571428571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sugar Cookie vegan?

No, Sugar Cookie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sugar Cookie and Paleo Puffs Himalayan Salt?

There is a difference of 16 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.