Head-to-Head Analysis

SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar vs 70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar

SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of 70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds

70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
378 kcal
Energy
586 kcal
6.8g
Sugars
20.2g
6.1g
Fat
44.1g
20.3g
Protein
18g
2.2g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar and 70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar is the clear winner. With 208 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar takes the lead with only 6.76g of sugar per 100g, whereas 70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds contains 20.2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar offers a protein boost with 20.3g per 100g, outperforming 70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar or 70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds?

SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar vegan?

No, SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between SUPER! MAC Shells & Real Aged Cheddar and 70% Dark Chocolate Cocoa Dusted Almonds?

There is a difference of 208 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.